Repeating the Same Thing Over and Over Again in Autism

Update Jan seven, 2022: The numbers in the Kingdom of denmark study described below are at present confirmed past government information from Germany showing that vaccinated people are 8X more than likely to develop Omicron than unvaccinated people. This is not surprising since a paper from Germany showed the same thing: the more you vaccinate, the worse information technology gets.

Worried nigh Omicron? Guess what? Afterward 90 days, the vaccine they gave y'all is going to brand you More than likely to get infected from Omicron, not less. The longer you lot stay on the vaccine treadmill, the harder to get off in the futurity and the easier you'll make it for the virus.

In short, we've been lied to well-nigh the vaccine. It is protecting you less and less over time. While you may go a do good for earlier variants, the benefit for other variants (and likely other diseases) is going to be negative. In short, you are getting a curt term benefit against Delta, merely at the expense of a degradation of your overall amnesty to everything else.

These vaccines may help you win the war against a variant that may before long be rare, but the toll y'all pay is that you brand your immunity to everything else worse. It'south a dumb tradeoff (especially since early on treatments work so well). But the people making the laws won't believe any of the science referenced in this commodity, so it will go along.

Alix Mayer alerted me to this game changing tweet about a report in Denmark which instantly went viral as you tin can see from the number of retweets:

I desire to tell you what this really means and how information technology is beingness attacked.

Summary: Reject to comply with mandates. Now.

This paper means we will demand to inject people every 30 days if we want to "protect" them. Based on the harm that the vaccines exercise to our immune system, it'southward probable that the needed interval will shorten with each booster.

If people don't get boosted every bit required, they will be More vulnerable to Delta and Omicron than if they weren't vaccinated. That's what NEGATIVE vaccine efficacy means. Information technology doesn't mean the protection wears off (like we were told). It ways the OPPOSITE of what you were told: it means the vaccines helps the virus to infect y'all (by suppressing your immune system, probably permanently each time nosotros are injected according to Dr. Ryan Cole). Information technology ways we were lied to.

In short, the vaccine is like a heroin addiction: one time you've had a taste of information technology, you are hooked: you lot have to continue it for life if you desire protection. If y'all end information technology, yous're a sitting duck for the virus.

What's worse is our regime is mandating this now. In light of this paper, they will change the vaccine mandates to force y'all to get vaccinated every month or yous will be fired from your task. Their next move could well be to make it illegal non to be vaccinated. This seems like where things are headed based on what is happening in other countries where they are rapidly stripping abroad your rights to practice annihilation without a vaccination.

And nosotros have no clue what monthly (and later weekly) vaccination will do to your body. This has never been tested.

My advice is simple. If you lot have been vaccinated, you lot need to end at present. Do not become the booster. My friend Dr. Robert Malone is addicted of repeating the old aphorism, "When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging ."

Sadly, most people cannot afford to lose their jobs, so they will get vaccinated and medical professionals will non speak out since doing so will cause them to lose their license.

The faster, safer, lower price style to cease the pandemic

Anybody needs to end listening to the CDC now and start listening to people who have been proverb to ditch the vaccines and aggressively promote early on treatment with repurposed drugs.

The entire pandemic volition cease every bit presently as the CDC stops ignoring the existing early treatment protocols which have been bachelor since March 2020 (Fareed and Tyson protocol was offset available back and then). Masking, vaccines, mandates, lockdowns, and social distancing were never needed. We could have (and still can) stop the hospitalization and death with but one affair: early handling. Just like Japan has washed. Only the CDC refused to listen.

What the paper said in particular

Outset, the link in the tweet is to the outdated version of the newspaper. The current version can exist constitute hither.

Start at the comments, both from social media and likewise from medrxiv readers.

Check out the social media portion of the comments

Here are some comments (on old and new version of the paper):

• Then presume the results you like (high VE for recent vaccination) are causal, but hand wave confounders at results yous don't similar (negative VE for afar vaccination)? Scientific discipline?

• This is a superb newspaper, especially the careful approach to CNV calling and the Bayesian methods used throughout.

• Looking at the graphs, I see both vaccines lose all effectiveness at 90 days, but worse, actually driblet into strong negative effectiveness afterward that time.

  This would mean that these vaccines *increase* one's chances of infection subsequently the initial xc days "honeymoon" period.

  Am I getting this right?

  If and so, why are governments pushing 3rd doses as Omicron is becoming dominant?

The cardinal material is in the full PDF:

The graphs above tell the story. Negative VE means the vaccine is helping the virus, not y'all.

And so at 60 days, the protection is close to cipher, so if yous desire to maintain protection, getting vaccinated every 30 days is required.

This isn't a vaccine at all. This is basically stimulating your immune system so it is already "geared upward" to fight the virus. That'south non what a vaccine is supposed to do.

Furthermore, the negative VE later 90 days means y'all are hooked for life and I would guess (based on the mechanism of action), that we will need shorter and shorter dosing intervals for every booster yous get (since it kills off your immune system every time).

So it could very well be monthly boosters after the second dose, weekly boosters after the 3rd dose, and perhaps daily boosters after the 4th dose to maintain your "amnesty."

You can't stop after that because if y'all stop, you're in worse shape than if you never started.

The stunning conclusion of the paper

In light of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the demand for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations.

All I can say is "wow." The people who wrote this newspaper are clearly drinking the Kool-Aid on their interpretation of what their study ways.

They also wrote this (which is purely speculative with no data behind it as noted in the italics were my improver):

The negative estimates in the final period arguably propose unlike behaviour and/or exposure patterns in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts causing underestimation of the VE. This was probable the result of Omicron spreading rapidly initially through single (super-spreading) events causing many infections among young, vaccinated individuals.

This paper should be a wake up call: the vaccines do not work. Cease repeating the insanity.

Early treatments like the Fareed and Tyson protocol are 10X better than any new therapy, they don't "hook you," and they don't crusade inability or death.

If doctors started prescribing the Fareed and Tyson protocol, we'd take virtually no deaths, and few hospitalizations. But they can't do that since medical board will take away the licenses of whatever physicians who prescribe ivermectin, etc. This is happening now.

We are in this mess because the NIH, CDC, FDA are decadent and incompetent and they volition non hold themselves accountable in an open debate. This has been going on for 20 years in the vaccine infinite… it's zilch new. The volume "Evidence of harm" documents all of this. Kirby was deliberately neutral in his presentation (being non-judgmental like reporters are supposed to be), but any neutral thinking person will side against the authorities.

Why the paper went viral

And then, the reason this paper went viral is because

1. It is well washed,

2. It was done by PhDs in infectious affliction and epidemiology,

3. The results show what is really happening, and

4. Nobody has been able to attack the paper with a apparent argument, even on Twitter.

5. It confirms what my team of experts has been saying well-nigh negative VE

Here are some of the ridiculous attempts to discredit the paper:

Supporting show

The paper isn't a fluke. There is lots of other evidence in support of the negative VE (and not supporting their speculative caption for it).

Here's the data from Canada which shows that we take information technology backwards. We should be mandating "no vaccines" in order to keep your job and fire all the vaccinated people because these people are the almost risky.

In Ontario in the last few days, cases per capita among the vaccinated accept skyrocketed in a higher place cases per capita among the unvaccinated. Clearly, mandates are nonsensical at this point, because the entire case for restricting unvaccinated people is their presumed higher per capita infection rate.

Here'south the Uk information showing the aforementioned thing. We demand to flip around the mandates ASAP.

Other supporting data:

1. On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable bear witness of their causative function in deaths subsequently vaccination and the video about that paper. If the vaccines don't kill yous, they volition exit you weaker. Over ninety% of the deaths investigated subsequently vaccination were found to have been caused by the vaccines. There is no other explanation.

2. The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate allowed responses
   An first-class article by Jessica Rose which explains the underlying mechanism for why we are seeing the effect that the more you vaccinate, the more you make things worse for people. The vaccine damages both your adaptive and innate immune systems.

3. Vaccine efficacy declines to be negative in the Great britain (Expose article)

4. Booster protection fades within 10 weeks confronting Omicron: UK report

5. Booster shots protect against symptomatic Omicron infection for about ten weeks, study finds — which could mean more doses for some in 2022

6. This substack commodity looks at the Danish study (described here) and the UK data. Note that the VE numbers in the two studies are different because if yous separate our Omicron, you get a very different picture of VE compared to analyses that don't divide out VE by variant.

7. Dr. Ron Brownish – Opinion Editorial

   December 23, 2021

   Ontario, Canada reported 5,790 new COVID-nineteen cases on Thursday, Dec 23, 2021, setting the province'southward one-day tape for new cases since the beginning of the pandemic: Ontario: Case numbers | COVID-19. Th'southward numbers include 971 unvaccinated new cases compared to four,392 fully vaccinated new cases—a rapidly ascent trend over the past several weeks clearly showing that well-nigh new cases are at present occurring in fully vaccinated people.

Please help united states of america to spread the word by sharing this commodity on social media.

vinyardchapted.blogspot.com

Source: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-shows-vaccines-must-be

Share this post